The federal net corporate tax rate is currently 15%. For small businesses, this figure is 11%. However, businesses are also subject to provincial taxation, so their total tax rate will be higher. Canada’s average combined federal-provincial tax rate is currently 26.3%. By comparison, the average corporate tax rate for G7 countries is 29.9% and in the United States it is 39% (but the U.S. has a complex system of tax deductions which effectively reduces overall corporate tax rate). Those in favour of lowering corporate tax rates argue that high taxation harms economic growth. They point out that a reduction in corporate tax rates does not always lead to a significant reduction in government revenues from corporate taxes. As taxes decrease, companies are more likely to invest and expand, potentially leading to more taxable profits and higher tax revenues by government. Reducing corporate tax rates also provides incentives for multinational firms to shift taxable activities into countries with lower tax rates. By contrast, increasing corporate tax levels would initially increase government income, but this may be short-lived as corporations alter their spending habits and investment in the long-run to avoid taxation. Those in favour of raising corporate tax rates argue that there is no definitive proof that higher taxes harms economic growth, and could in fact help spur growth through increased government spending and investment. They also argue that corporations gain benefits from government spending such as better infrastructure, healthier workers, and better human capital from education and social programs, so corporations should be expected to contribute to these. There is debate as to the extent and ability of some high-income professionals to reduce the amount of income tax they pay by abusing the lower corporate tax rate for small businesses . They can do this by shifting their income into a Canadian Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC) that qualifies as a small business, and then giving their revenue as dividends to lower-income family members—all while taking advantage of other benefits to reduce their tax burden. Economist Jack Mintz has estimated that 60% of the small business deduction goes to households with incomes of more than $150,000, while economist Michael Wolfson has estimated that 5-10% of small businesses act as tax shelters (a means of avoiding taxes), and that the government loses around a half billion dollars per year due to this. However, these estimates are difficult to prove and small business associations have argued that this is the exception to the rule. Moreover, they argue that small businesses should be given greater tax benefits as they face higher wages, tax, and other costs relative to larger corporations.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
References
- The Toronto Star
- National Post
- The Toronto Star
- CBC
- CBC
- Conservative Website
- The Winnipeg Free Press
- The Toronto Star
- Macleans
- The Star Pheonix
- NDP Website
- The Toronto Sun
- The Toronto Star
- CBC
- CBC
- NDP Website
- Macleans
- The Globe and Mail
- CBC
- Green Party Website
- Green Party Website
Further Reading
- Macleans on Corporate Taxation
- Forbes on Why Tax Cuts for Corporations Increase Government Revenue
- Business Insider on why Tax Cuts for Coprorations Undermine Growth
- Macleans on Small Buisnesses Being Used to Avoid Taxation
- Global News on Small Buisnesses Being Used to Avoid Taxation
- School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary, “Small Business Taxtion” Duanjie Chen and Jack Mintz
- “Piercing the Veil – Private Corporations and the Income of the Affluent,” Michael Wolfson, Mike Veall, Neil Brooks
- Huffington Post on Small Buisnesses Being Used to Avoid Taxation
- Financial Post on Small Buisness Taxation